Turn programme data, delay events and project records into a structured, traceable basis for Extension of Time analysis.
Contract Solutions AI brings together baseline and updated programmes, progress information, delay events, notices, correspondence and contractual provisions. It helps teams map events to activities, examine critical and driving paths, assess concurrency and mitigation, and structure EOT analysis for professional planning and contractual review.
Connect programme logic, records and contractual entitlement in one professional workflow.
Major projects develop through multiple programme revisions, progress updates, instructions, access constraints, design changes, approvals, variations and other events. The critical path may move over time, while logic changes, calendars, constraints, float consumption, resequencing and mitigation can materially affect the delay position.
A defensible EOT analysis therefore needs to connect the contractual event to the relevant programme activities, establish the timing and period of impact, examine criticality and concurrent delay, and explain the resulting effect on a contractual completion date or milestone. Delay & EOT Analysis is designed to organise that process around traceable programme data and contemporaneous project records.
Organise baseline, accepted or approved programmes, periodic updates, revised programmes, lookaheads and progress information. Review available activity dates, logic, calendars, constraints, milestones, float and progress data before detailed delay analysis begins. Programme information from Oracle Primavera P6, Microsoft Project and comparable scheduling environments can be incorporated subject to the available data and professional validation.
Identify and classify potential delay events and reconstruct when they arose, how long they persisted and which records support them. Instructions, access issues, approvals, design information, variations, interfaces, authority matters and other project events can be mapped into a coordinated chronology.
Connect each delay event with the relevant contractual provisions, notice requirements, procedural steps and potential EOT entitlement. The workflow can support FIDIC, NEC, amended standard forms and bespoke contracts, while keeping contractual analysis separate from programme impact assessment.
Map events to affected activities and review whether those activities were critical, near-critical or driving the relevant milestone during the period under consideration. Track how the critical or driving path may have changed across successive programme updates rather than relying on a single static programme.
Structure programme and factual inputs for professional analysis using recognised approaches such as Time Impact Analysis, windows or time-slice analysis, As-Planned versus As-Built, Impacted As-Planned or other appropriate methodologies. Method selection and final analytical conclusions remain subject to the project records and professional delay-planning judgment.
Identify periods requiring review for potential concurrent delay, float availability or consumption, mitigation, acceleration, resequencing and recovery measures. Bring contractor, employer and neutral project events into a common timeline so competing causes can be examined transparently.
Structure the link between event duration, programme impact period, criticality and the resulting movement of contractual completion or interim milestones. Separate event duration from compensable or excusable time impact so the requested extension is supported by a clear analytical path.
Convert validated programme findings, contract entitlement and contemporaneous records into a coordinated EOT analysis. Organise methodology, event-by-event reasoning, programme references, charts, appendices and evidentiary links for interim submissions, detailed claims, assessments or dispute preparation.
The objective is not simply to produce a delay narrative, but to create a traceable working record showing how programme evidence, contractual entitlement and factual events support the EOT position.
A structured review of available baseline and update programmes, programme versions, progress records and data gaps requiring clarification before analysis.
Potential delay events organised by date, cause, responsibility, contractual basis, affected period, relevant records and current analysis status.
Key changes between programme versions identified for review, including logic, dates, progress, constraints, milestones and changes affecting the critical or driving path.
Delay events linked to programme activities, milestones and analysis periods so factual events can be traced directly to the relevant programme context.
A structured review of the activities and paths influencing contractual completion or relevant milestones during the periods affected by the claimed events.
Potential concurrent events, float issues, mitigation measures, resequencing and recovery actions organised by period for professional assessment.
Each event mapped to contractual entitlement, notices, impact period, affected completion or milestone and the extension potentially supported by the analysis.
A coordinated report framework combining methodology, event chronologies, programme references, records, entitlement and the proposed EOT position for professional review.
Contract Solutions AI supports programme and EOT analysis workflows. Final methodology selection, critical-path conclusions and delay opinions should be reviewed and validated by appropriately qualified planning, delay, contractual and other specialist professionals where required.
The same programme and event structure can develop as the project progresses, reducing the need to reconstruct the delay history only after the dispute has matured.
Review programme structure, contractual milestones, available schedule records and data quality before delay events accumulate.
Track emerging events against current programme activities, notices and records while the project is progressing.
Maintain event and programme analysis over successive updates to support interim or periodically updated EOT submissions.
Consolidate programme history, events, contractual grounds and supporting records into a detailed final time-entitlement position.
Support review of submitted EOT claims, counter-analysis, expert preparation, adjudication, dispute board or arbitration workflows.
Programme automation should accelerate the analytical workflow without replacing the planner or delay expert. The platform is designed to make the underlying logic, assumptions and evidence easier to review.
Bring together the contract, relevant milestones, baseline and updated programme information from Primavera P6, Microsoft Project or comparable scheduling sources, together with available progress records.
Build the event chronology and programme history by connecting instructions, notices, correspondence, actual progress and schedule versions.
Map events to activities, review criticality and driving paths, examine concurrency and mitigation, and structure the selected delay methodology.
Review the programme logic and conclusions professionally, then assemble the validated time-impact reasoning, entitlement and evidence into the EOT position.
