Issue Tree & Case Theory Mapping
Break the dispute into claims, counterclaims, defences, contractual issues, factual propositions and required elements of proof for counsel and expert review.
Organise the contract, facts, evidence and expert workstreams behind complex construction disputes.
Contract Solutions AI supports counsel-led and expert-led dispute preparation by structuring large project records into issues, chronologies, source-linked evidence and coordinated workstreams. It can assist with dispute boards, adjudication, arbitration and other formal or negotiated dispute processes while keeping legal analysis and final professional opinions with the responsible lawyers and experts.
A traceable working record for counsel, experts and project teams.
Construction disputes may involve years of correspondence, programme files, payment records, technical documents, notices, meeting minutes, claim submissions, determinations and expert analyses. The same event may appear differently across contractual, factual, delay, quantum and technical workstreams.
A useful dispute-support system should make those relationships reviewable. It should help the team identify what is alleged, what must be proved, which documents support or contradict the position, what expert input is still missing and how the chronology connects with the pleaded or negotiated case.
Break the dispute into claims, counterclaims, defences, contractual issues, factual propositions and required elements of proof for counsel and expert review.
Build a source-linked chronology from correspondence, notices, instructions, minutes, programmes, reports and other project records, with the ability to view events by issue or workstream.
Connect propositions and disputed facts with the supporting or contradictory source documents so the team can trace the evidentiary basis behind each position.
Map each party’s stated position, contractual basis, factual allegations, relief sought, responses, admissions, disputed points and evidentiary gaps in one working structure.
Organise factual topics, contemporaneous records and potential witness knowledge to support lawyer-led witness preparation without generating or replacing witness evidence.
Coordinate delay, quantum, technical and other expert inputs by issue, required source documents, assumptions, dependencies and outstanding questions.
Structure potentially relevant document populations, review status, issue tags and document requests or production workstreams subject to the applicable procedural rules and counsel direction.
Track key procedural dates, requested inputs, open evidence, expert dependencies and submission components so the team can see what is required before the next procedural milestone.
The objective is to reduce duplicated review and make every important proposition traceable back to the contemporaneous project record.
Claims, counterclaims, defences, disputed propositions, contractual grounds, relief and responsibility for each workstream organised in one master issue map.
A source-linked timeline of the project and disputed events, filterable by issue, party, contractual process, delay event or other workstream.
Key documents mapped to the facts or issues they support, contradict or contextualise, together with review notes and outstanding evidentiary gaps.
The parties’ competing positions presented side by side with references to pleadings, submissions, notices, determinations and supporting records.
Potential factual topics, contemporaneous documents and witness knowledge areas organised for counsel-led interview and statement preparation.
Questions, source documents, assumptions and dependencies allocated across delay, quantum, technical and other expert workstreams.
Document populations, search or review status, issue coding and request/production tracking organised under the procedural approach directed by counsel.
An organised working pack of issues, chronologies, evidence, expert dependencies and open actions supporting counsel and experts before submissions, hearings or settlement discussions.
Contract Solutions AI is a dispute-support and information-organisation tool. It does not provide legal advice, make legal determinations, replace counsel, prepare independent expert opinions or replace witness evidence. All legal strategy, submissions, expert conclusions and procedural decisions remain subject to qualified professional review.
The earlier the evidence architecture is built, the less time the team spends reconstructing the project record after positions have hardened.
Organise the issue, contract record and evidence before escalation, without assuming that formal proceedings are inevitable.
Prepare issue files, chronologies, contractual history and evidence for DAAB/DAB, adjudication or comparable project-level dispute mechanisms where applicable.
Support settlement analysis by clarifying disputed propositions, evidentiary strengths, expert dependencies and areas capable of narrowing.
Coordinate counsel, project witnesses and expert workstreams across large document sets, pleadings, chronologies and procedural milestones.
Maintain an issue-centred record of evidence, witness topics, expert materials and open actions as the case develops toward or through a hearing.
The platform can accelerate organisation, search and cross-referencing, while legal strategy and expert judgment remain with the appointed professional team.
Define the disputed issues, parties’ positions, relief sought, contractual mechanisms and questions that need factual or expert proof.
Bring together the contract, correspondence, notices, programmes, payment records, technical documents, prior submissions and other relevant evidence.
Map evidence to propositions, identify contradictions and gaps, and coordinate witness, delay, quantum, technical and legal workstreams.
Assemble reviewable chronologies, issue packs and submission support, then update the record as pleadings, expert reports and procedural directions evolve.